lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
From
Date
On Mon, 2019-06-24 at 21:31 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:19:13AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> > cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> >
> > This patch fixes the following warnings:
> >
> > arch/x86/events/intel/core.c: In function ‘intel_pmu_init’:
> > arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:4959:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> > pmem = true;
> > ~~~~~^~~~~~
> > arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:4960:2: note: here
> > case INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE:
> > ^~~~
> > arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:5008:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> > pmem = true;
> > ~~~~~^~~~~~
> > arch/x86/events/intel/core.c:5009:2: note: here
> > case INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_MOBILE:
> > ^~~~
> >
> > Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
> >
> > This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> > -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
>
> I still consider it an abomination that the C parser looks at comments
> -- other than to delete them, but OK I suppose, I'll take it.

I still believe Arnaldo's/Miguel's/Shawn's/my et al. suggestion of

#define __fallthrough __attribute__((fallthrough))

is far better.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/9/845
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/10/485
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181021171414.22674-2-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190617155643.GA32544@amd/



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-24 21:46    [W:0.102 / U:51.180 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site