lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too

> Is this a safety clause? What I mean is, shouldn't the hardware design make
> sure there are not two devices located on the same I2C bus with the same slave
> address?

It is more about preventing userspace to accidently access this address,
and thus the registers behind it.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-20 11:21    [W:0.130 / U:1.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site