Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Jun 2019 11:21:16 +0200 | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too |
| |
> Is this a safety clause? What I mean is, shouldn't the hardware design make > sure there are not two devices located on the same I2C bus with the same slave > address?
It is more about preventing userspace to accidently access this address, and thus the registers behind it.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
| |