lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: Use has_target() instead of !setpolicy
Date
For code consistency, use has_target() instead of !setpolicy everywhere,
as it is already done at several places. Maybe we should also use
!has_target() for setpolicy case to use only one expression for this
differentiation.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 41ac701e324f..5f5c7a516c74 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static int cpufreq_parse_policy(char *str_governor,
}

/**
- * cpufreq_parse_governor - parse a governor string only for !setpolicy
+ * cpufreq_parse_governor - parse a governor string only for has_target()
*/
static int cpufreq_parse_governor(char *str_governor,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
@@ -1301,7 +1301,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
policy->max = policy->user_policy.max;
}

- if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
+ if (cpufreq_driver->get && has_target()) {
policy->cur = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu);
if (!policy->cur) {
pr_err("%s: ->get() failed\n", __func__);
@@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
* BIOS might change freq behind our back
* -> ask driver for current freq and notify governors about a change
*/
- if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy &&
+ if (cpufreq_driver->get && has_target() &&
(cpufreq_suspended || WARN_ON(!cpufreq_update_current_freq(policy))))
goto unlock;

--
2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-19 13:36    [W:0.092 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site