lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 09/19] btrfs: limit super block locations in HMZONED mode
Date
On 2019/06/18 7:53, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 10:10:15PM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
>> When in HMZONED mode, make sure that device super blocks are located in
>> randomly writable zones of zoned block devices. That is, do not write super
>> blocks in sequential write required zones of host-managed zoned block
>> devices as update would not be possible.
>
> This could be explained in more detail. My understanding is that the 1st
> and 2nd copy superblocks is skipped at write time but the zone
> containing the superblocks is not excluded from allocations. Ie. regular
> data can appear in place where the superblocks would exist on
> non-hmzoned filesystem. Is that correct?

Correct. You can see regular data stored at usually SB location on HMZONED fs.

> The other option is to completely exclude the zone that contains the
> superblock copies.
>
> primary sb 64K
> 1st copy 64M
> 2nd copy 256G
>
> Depends on the drives, but I think the size of the random write zone
> will very often cover primary and 1st copy. So there's at least some
> backup copy.
>
> The 2nd copy will be in the sequential-only zone, so the whole zone
> needs to be excluded in exclude_super_stripes. But it's not, so this
> means data can go there. I think the zone should be left empty.
>

I see. That's more safe for the older kernel/userland, right? By keeping that zone empty,
we can avoid old ones to mis-interpret data to be SB.

Alright, I will change the code to do so.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-18 11:03    [W:0.121 / U:4.088 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site