lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 3/5] x86/umwait: Add sysfs interface to control umwait C0.2 state
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 05:19:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 5:09 PM Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> wrote:
> But you're already using a mutex and a comment. And you're hoping
> that the syscore resume callback reads something sensible despite the
> lack of READ_ONCE / WRITE_ONCE. The compiler is unlikely to butcher
> this too badly, but still.

You are right, syscore_resume will be wrong if suspend in middle of
sysfs writing.

Ok. I change this patch based on your proposed locking. Is this patch
right? Should I use WRITE_ONCE/READ_ONCE on each access of
umwait_control_cached?

Thanks.

-Fenghua

diff --git a/arch/x86/power/umwait.c b/arch/x86/power/umwait.c
index 9594af9f657e..d17572605c1a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/umwait.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/umwait.c
@@ -11,10 +11,34 @@
*/
static u32 umwait_control_cached = 100000 & ~MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL_C02_DISABLED;

+/*
+ * Serialize access to umwait_control_cached and IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL MSR
+ * in writing sysfs to ensure all CPUs have the same MSR value.
+ */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(umwait_lock);
+
+static void update_this_cpu_umwait_control_msr(void)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /*
+ * We need to prevent umwait_control_cached from being changed *and*
+ * completing its WRMSR between our read and our WRMSR. By turning
+ * IRQs off here, ensure that no sysfs write happens on this CPU
+ * and we also make sure that any concurrent sysfs write from a
+ * different CPU will not finish updating us via IPI until we're done.
+ */
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+
+ wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL, READ_ONCE(umwait_control_cached), 0);
+
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+}
+
/* Set up IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL MSR on CPU using the current global setting. */
static int umwait_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
{
- wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL, umwait_control_cached, 0);
+ update_this_cpu_umwait_control_msr();

return 0;
}
@@ -30,24 +54,102 @@ static int umwait_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
*/
static void umwait_syscore_resume(void)
{
- wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL, umwait_control_cached, 0);
+ update_this_cpu_umwait_control_msr();
}

static struct syscore_ops umwait_syscore_ops = {
.resume = umwait_syscore_resume,
};

+static void umwait_control_msr_update(void *unused)
+{
+ update_this_cpu_umwait_control_msr();
+}
+
+static u32 get_umwait_control_c02(void)
+{
+ return READ_ONCE(umwait_control_cached) & MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL_C02_DISABLED;
+}
+
+static u32 get_umwait_control_max_time(void)
+{
+ return READ_ONCE(umwait_control_cached) & MSR_IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL_MAX_TIME;
+}
+
+static ssize_t
+enable_c02_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ /*
+ * When bit 0 in IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL MSR is 1, C0.2 is disabled.
+ * Otherwise, C0.2 is enabled. Show the opposite of bit 0.
+ */
+ return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", !(bool)get_umwait_control_c02());
+}
+
+static ssize_t enable_c02_store(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+ u32 umwait_control_c02;
+ bool c02_enabled;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = kstrtobool(buf, &c02_enabled);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&umwait_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * The value of bit 0 in IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL MSR is opposite of
+ * c02_enabled.
+ */
+ umwait_control_c02 = (u32)!c02_enabled;
+ if (umwait_control_c02 == get_umwait_control_c02())
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(umwait_control_cached, umwait_control_c02 | get_umwait_control_max_time());
+ /* Enable/disable C0.2 state on all CPUs */
+ on_each_cpu(umwait_control_msr_update, NULL, 1);
+
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&umwait_lock);
+
+ return count;
+}
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(enable_c02);
+
+static struct attribute *umwait_attrs[] = {
+ &dev_attr_enable_c02.attr,
+ NULL
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group umwait_attr_group = {
+ .attrs = umwait_attrs,
+ .name = "umwait_control",
+};
+
static int __init umwait_init(void)
{
+ struct device *dev;
int ret;

if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_WAITPKG))
return -ENODEV;

+ /* Add umwait control interface. */
+ dev = cpu_subsys.dev_root;
+ ret = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &umwait_attr_group);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "umwait/intel:online",
umwait_cpu_online, NULL);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &umwait_attr_group);
+
return ret;
+ }

register_syscore_ops(&umwait_syscore_ops);

--
2.19.1

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-18 04:42    [W:0.060 / U:2.616 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site