lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v5 3/6] clk: qcom: smd: Add XO clock for MSM8998
Date
The XO clock generally feeds into other clock controllers as the parent
for a lot of clock generators.

Drop the "fake" XO clock in GCC now that it is redundant can will cause a
namespace conflict. Also enumerate the RPMCC dependency of GCC in Kconfig.

Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8998.c | 29 ++++++++++++-----------------
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
index 18bdf34..6c319ca 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
@@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ config MSM_MMCC_8996
config MSM_GCC_8998
tristate "MSM8998 Global Clock Controller"
select QCOM_GDSC
+ select QCOM_CLK_SMD_RPM
help
Support for the global clock controller on msm8998 devices.
Say Y if you want to use peripheral devices such as UART, SPI,
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
index 22dd42a..55a622df 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
}

#define __DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _active, type, r_id, \
- stat_id, r, key) \
+ stat_id, r, key, ignore_unused) \
static struct clk_smd_rpm _platform##_##_active; \
static struct clk_smd_rpm _platform##_##_name = { \
.rpm_res_type = (type), \
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
.name = #_name, \
.parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo_board" }, \
.num_parents = 1, \
+ .flags = (ignore_unused) ? CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED : 0, \
}, \
}; \
static struct clk_smd_rpm _platform##_##_active = { \
@@ -99,6 +100,7 @@
.name = #_active, \
.parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo_board" }, \
.num_parents = 1, \
+ .flags = (ignore_unused) ? CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED : 0, \
}, \
}

@@ -108,7 +110,17 @@

#define DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _active, type, r_id, r) \
__DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _active, type, \
- r_id, 0, r, QCOM_RPM_SMD_KEY_ENABLE)
+ r_id, 0, r, QCOM_RPM_SMD_KEY_ENABLE, false)
+
+/*
+ * Intended for XO clock where we don't want it turned off during late init
+ * if we don't have a consumer by then, but can turn it off later for deep
+ * sleep
+ */
+#define DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH_SKIP_UNUSED(_platform, _name, _active, type,\
+ r_id, r) \
+ __DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _active, type, \
+ r_id, 0, r, QCOM_RPM_SMD_KEY_ENABLE, true)

#define DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_QDSS(_platform, _name, _active, type, r_id) \
__DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(_platform, _name, _active, type, r_id, \
@@ -117,12 +129,12 @@
#define DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(_platform, _name, _active, r_id) \
__DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _active, \
QCOM_SMD_RPM_CLK_BUF_A, r_id, 0, 1000, \
- QCOM_RPM_KEY_SOFTWARE_ENABLE)
+ QCOM_RPM_KEY_SOFTWARE_ENABLE, false)

#define DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(_platform, _name, _active, r_id) \
__DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH(_platform, _name, _active, \
QCOM_SMD_RPM_CLK_BUF_A, r_id, 0, 1000, \
- QCOM_RPM_KEY_PIN_CTRL_CLK_BUFFER_ENABLE_KEY)
+ QCOM_RPM_KEY_PIN_CTRL_CLK_BUFFER_ENABLE_KEY, false)

#define to_clk_smd_rpm(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct clk_smd_rpm, hw)

@@ -656,6 +668,8 @@ static int clk_smd_rpm_enable_scaling(struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm)
};

/* msm8998 */
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_BRANCH_SKIP_UNUSED(msm8998, xo, xo_a, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK,
+ 0, 19200000);
DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8998, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);
DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8998, cnoc_clk, cnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 2);
DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8998, ce1_clk, ce1_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_CE_CLK, 0);
@@ -678,6 +692,8 @@ static int clk_smd_rpm_enable_scaling(struct qcom_smd_rpm *rpm)
DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8998, rf_clk3, rf_clk3_a, 6);
DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8998, rf_clk3_pin, rf_clk3_a_pin, 6);
static struct clk_smd_rpm *msm8998_clks[] = {
+ [RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC] = &msm8998_xo,
+ [RPM_SMD_XO_A_CLK_SRC] = &msm8998_xo_a,
[RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK] = &msm8998_snoc_clk,
[RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK] = &msm8998_snoc_a_clk,
[RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK] = &msm8998_cnoc_clk,
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8998.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8998.c
index 0336882..9c47cbd 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8998.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8998.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/reset-controller.h>

@@ -117,17 +118,6 @@ enum {
"core_bi_pll_test_se",
};

-static struct clk_fixed_factor xo = {
- .mult = 1,
- .div = 1,
- .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
- .name = "xo",
- .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "xo_board" },
- .num_parents = 1,
- .ops = &clk_fixed_factor_ops,
- },
-};
-
static struct pll_vco fabia_vco[] = {
{ 250000000, 2000000000, 0 },
{ 125000000, 1000000000, 1 },
@@ -2959,10 +2949,6 @@ enum {
.fast_io = true,
};

-static struct clk_hw *gcc_msm8998_hws[] = {
- &xo.hw,
-};
-
static const struct qcom_cc_desc gcc_msm8998_desc = {
.config = &gcc_msm8998_regmap_config,
.clks = gcc_msm8998_clocks,
@@ -2971,14 +2957,23 @@ enum {
.num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_msm8998_resets),
.gdscs = gcc_msm8998_gdscs,
.num_gdscs = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_msm8998_gdscs),
- .clk_hws = gcc_msm8998_hws,
- .num_clk_hws = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_msm8998_hws),
};

static int gcc_msm8998_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct regmap *regmap;
int ret;
+ struct clk *xo;
+
+ /*
+ * We must have a valid XO to continue, otherwise having a missing
+ * parent on a system critical clock like the uart core clock can
+ * result in strange bugs. We know XO will be provided by rpmcc,
+ * but it might not be specifid in DT like it should.
+ */
+ xo = __clk_lookup("xo");
+ if (!xo)
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;

regmap = qcom_cc_map(pdev, &gcc_msm8998_desc);
if (IS_ERR(regmap))
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-12 21:12    [W:0.055 / U:17.012 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site