lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 4/5] media: ov6650: Fix frame scaling not reset on crop
Hi Janusz,

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 07:56:33PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On Friday, May 31, 2019 1:42:58 PM CEST Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Janusz,
> >
> > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:47:57PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > According to V4L2 subdevice interface specification, frame scaling
> > > factors should be reset to default values on modification of input frame
> > > format. Assuming that requirement also applies in case of crop
> > > rectangle modification unless V4L2_SEL_FLAG_KEEP_CONFIG is requested,
> > > the driver now does not respect it.
> > >
> > > The KEEP_CONFIG case is already implemented, fix the other path.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c
> > > index 47590cd51190..cc70d8952999 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov6650.c
> > > @@ -472,6 +472,8 @@ static int ov6650_get_selection(struct v4l2_subdev
> *sd,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int ov6650_s_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 code, bool
> half_scale);
> > > +
> >
> > Would it be possible to rearrange the functions in the file so you wouldn't
> > need extra prototypes? Preferrably that'd be a new patch.
>
> Sure. I've intentionally done it like that for better readability of the
> patches, but I have a task in my queue for rearrangement of functions order as
> soon as other modifications are in place.

I'm totally fine with doing that after this set on as well. Up to you.

>
> > > static int ov6650_set_selection(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > > struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> > > struct v4l2_subdev_selection *sel)
> > > @@ -515,7 +517,13 @@ static int ov6650_set_selection(struct v4l2_subdev
> *sd,
> > > }
> > > if (!ret)
> > > priv->rect.height = sel->r.height;
> > > + else
> > > + return ret;
> >
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
>
> OK
>
> Perhaps you will have more comments on other patches so I'll wait a bit and
> then resubmit the series as v2.

Not so much on this set BUT I realised that the subtle effect of "media:
ov6650: Register with asynchronous subdevice framework" is that the driver
is now responsible for serialising the access to its own data structures
now. And it doesn't do that. Could you submit a fix, please? It'd be good to
get that to 5.2 through the fixes branch.

--
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-02 00:39    [W:0.276 / U:0.676 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site