lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 006/141] ARM: prevent tracing IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE
Date
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

[ Upstream commit be167862ae7dd85c56d385209a4890678e1b0488 ]

Patch series "compiler: allow all arches to enable
CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING", v3.

This patch (of 11):

When function tracing for IPIs is enabled, we get a warning for an
overflow of the ipi_types array with the IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE type as
triggered by raise_nmi():

arch/arm/kernel/smp.c: In function 'raise_nmi':
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c:489:2: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
trace_ipi_raise(target, ipi_types[ipinr]);

This is a correct warning as we actually overflow the array here.

This patch raise_nmi() to call __smp_cross_call() instead of
smp_cross_call(), to avoid calling into ftrace. For clarification, I'm
also adding a two new code comments describing how this one is special.

The warning appears to have shown up after commit e7273ff49acf ("ARM:
8488/1: Make IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE a "non-secure" SGI"), which changed the
number assignment from '15' to '8', but as far as I can tell has existed
since the IPI tracepoints were first introduced. If we decide to
backport this patch to stable kernels, we probably need to backport
e7273ff49acf as well.

[yamada.masahiro@socionext.com: rebase on v5.1-rc1]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190423034959.13525-2-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Fixes: e7273ff49acf ("ARM: 8488/1: Make IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE a "non-secure" SGI")
Fixes: 365ec7b17327 ("ARM: add IPI tracepoints") # v3.17
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@kernel.org>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h | 1 +
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h
index cba23eaa60721..7a88f160b1fbe 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/threads.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>

+/* number of IPIS _not_ including IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE */
#define NR_IPI 7

typedef struct {
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
index a3ce7c5365fa8..bada66ef44193 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
@@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ enum ipi_msg_type {
IPI_CPU_STOP,
IPI_IRQ_WORK,
IPI_COMPLETION,
+ /*
+ * CPU_BACKTRACE is special and not included in NR_IPI
+ * or tracable with trace_ipi_*
+ */
IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE,
/*
* SGI8-15 can be reserved by secure firmware, and thus may
@@ -803,7 +807,7 @@ core_initcall(register_cpufreq_notifier);

static void raise_nmi(cpumask_t *mask)
{
- smp_cross_call(mask, IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE);
+ __smp_cross_call(mask, IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE);
}

void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, bool exclude_self)
--
2.20.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-06-01 15:22    [W:0.138 / U:35.120 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site