Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 7 May 2019 11:32:27 -0700 | From | Sami Tolvanen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: use the correct function type for __arm64_sys_ni_syscall |
| |
On Tue, May 07, 2019 at 06:25:12PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > I strongly think that we cant to fix up the common definition in > kernel/sys_ni.c rather than having a point-hack in arm64. Other > architectures (e.g. x86, s390) will want the same for CFI, and I'd like > to ensure that our approached don't diverge.
s390 already has the following in arch/s390/kernel/sys_s390.c:
SYSCALL_DEFINE0(ni_syscall) { return -ENOSYS; }
Which, I suppose, is cleaner than calling sys_ni_syscall.
> I took a quick look, and it looks like it's messy but possible to fix > up the core.
OK. How would you propose fixing this?
Sami
| |