Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ext4] 345c0dbf3a: xfstests.ext4.303.fail | From | Rong Chen <> | Date | Sun, 5 May 2019 17:12:21 +0800 |
| |
On 4/27/19 12:28 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 05:47:09PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): >> >> commit: 345c0dbf3a30872d9b204db96b5857cd00808cae ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity") >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git dev >> >> in testcase: xfstests >> with following parameters: >> >> disk: 4HDD >> fs: ext4 >> test: ext4-run > Hi, I'm not able to reproduce this.
Thanks for your input, we found the test result of ext4/303 is not stable on this commit, but it's no problem on v5.1-rc7.
> > TESTRUNID: tytso-20190426093752 > KERNEL: kernel 5.1.0-rc3-xfstests-00007-g345c0dbf3a30 #921 SMP Fri Apr 26 09:36:55 EDT 2019 x86_64 > CMDLINE: -c 4k -g auto > CPUS: 2 > MEM: 7680 > > ext4/4k: 462 tests, 43 skipped, 4271 seconds > Totals: 419 tests, 43 skipped, 0 failures, 0 errors, 4249s > > Ran: ext4/001 ext4/002 ext4/003 ext4/004 ext4/005 ext4/020 ext4/021 ext4/022 ext4/023 ext4/024 ext4/025 ext4/026 ext4/027 ext4/028 ext4/029 ext4/030 ext4/031 ext4/032 ext4/033 ext4/034 ext4/271 ext4/301 ext4/302 ext4/303 ext4/305 ext4/306 ext4/307 ext4/308 generic/001 generic/002 generic/003 .... > > Given some of the failures, especially this one:
Yes, it's our fault, we have fixed it.
Best Regards, Rong Chen
> >> ext4/307 - output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//ext4/307.out.bad) >> --- tests/ext4/307.out 2019-04-25 09:04:55.000000000 +0800 >> +++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//ext4/307.out.bad 2019-04-26 13:15:02.522490198 +0800 >> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ >> QA output created by 307 >> >> Run fsstress >> +./tests/ext4/307: line 34: gawk: command not found >> Allocate donor file >> Perform compacting >> Check data >> ... >> (Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/ext4/307.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//ext4/307.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > I'm very much wondering whether your VM has gotten corrupted or hasn't > been correctly set up? > > - Ted
| |