Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 04/12] clk: tegra: add support for peripheral clock suspend and resume | From | Sowjanya Komatineni <> | Date | Fri, 31 May 2019 12:55:56 -0700 |
| |
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1559332560; bh=fyUgksf15TgB7D/+ZMOAO7M7CVG31MW/WSQCDBy4pVQ=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP: X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Language; b=iqAjo2NdebEX6IQgtE+dZ1EoyeCEIZAqRf22p21EapkVX0OBJC3q4Gq7gRPrH2fJC uhLbg6vyTpA7tw+SL/Q6OC76foZllVOZDlC8m02oSU3qttQyJX5rCD59shHR+I4y1U EO5f5ynsViWBR2kJNtgRO2yTrKQCYOWgX2VSfb1c3OX347L/TSCQDDFU/bocKSDD6L cjVCbddyiIHj6HtpiRzWKIezGprf40oa5Lsd7heEqGTFe2IPIuIAcrtSjmg455iUvU qyKwofgEpOyXkvlW1Jy4Xm+1v3hRH1W5bgxWWMWL7BWkGQQDwHLZXwNVTA0iT/JH6L nz/b3Hyar6Dwg==
On 5/29/19 4:30 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Sowjanya Komatineni (2019-05-28 16:08:48) >> This patch implements peripheral clock context save and restore >> to support system suspend and resume operation. > Again, why? Will add more in commit in next version of this series. >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c >> index 6f2862eddad7..08b788766564 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c >> @@ -81,6 +81,10 @@ static struct clk **clks; >> static int clk_num; >> static struct clk_onecell_data clk_data; >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> +static u32 *periph_ctx; >> +#endif > Please move this into the ifdef below. > WIll fix in V3 >> + >> /* Handlers for SoC-specific reset lines */ >> static int (*special_reset_assert)(unsigned long); >> static int (*special_reset_deassert)(unsigned long); >> @@ -210,6 +214,65 @@ const struct tegra_clk_periph_regs *get_reg_bank(int clkid) >> } >> } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> +void tegra_clk_periph_suspend(void __iomem *clk_base) >> +{ >> + int i, idx; >> + >> + idx = 0; >> + for (i = 0; i < periph_banks; i++, idx++) >> + periph_ctx[idx] = >> + readl_relaxed(clk_base + periph_regs[i].rst_reg); >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < periph_banks; i++, idx++) >> + periph_ctx[idx] = >> + readl_relaxed(clk_base + periph_regs[i].enb_reg); >> +} >> + >> +void tegra_clk_periph_force_on(u32 *clks_on, int count, void __iomem *clk_base) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + >> + WARN_ON(count != periph_banks); >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) >> + writel_relaxed(clks_on[i], clk_base + periph_regs[i].enb_reg); >> +} >> + >> +void tegra_clk_periph_resume(void __iomem *clk_base) >> +{ >> + int i, idx; >> + >> + idx = 0; >> + for (i = 0; i < periph_banks; i++, idx++) >> + writel_relaxed(periph_ctx[idx], >> + clk_base + periph_regs[i].rst_reg); >> + >> + /* ensure all resets have propagated */ >> + fence_udelay(2, clk_base); >> + tegra_read_chipid(); >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < periph_banks; i++, idx++) >> + writel_relaxed(periph_ctx[idx], >> + clk_base + periph_regs[i].enb_reg); >> + >> + /* ensure all enables have propagated */ >> + fence_udelay(2, clk_base); >> + tegra_read_chipid(); >> +} >> + >> +static int tegra_clk_suspend_ctx_init(int banks) >> +{ >> + int err = 0; >> + >> + periph_ctx = kzalloc(2 * banks * sizeof(*periph_ctx), GFP_KERNEL); > Is this kcalloc(2 * banks, sizeof(*periph_ctx)... ? Will fix in V3 >> + if (!periph_ctx) >> + err = -ENOMEM; >> + >> + return err; >> +} >> +#endif >> + >> struct clk ** __init tegra_clk_init(void __iomem *regs, int num, int banks) >> { >> clk_base = regs; >> @@ -226,11 +289,20 @@ struct clk ** __init tegra_clk_init(void __iomem *regs, int num, int banks) >> periph_banks = banks; >> >> clks = kcalloc(num, sizeof(struct clk *), GFP_KERNEL); >> - if (!clks) >> + if (!clks) { >> kfree(periph_clk_enb_refcnt); >> + return NULL; >> + } >> >> clk_num = num; >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > Can you use if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)) here? Will fix in V3 > >> + if (tegra_clk_suspend_ctx_init(banks)) { >> + kfree(periph_clk_enb_refcnt); >> + kfree(clks); >> + return NULL; >> + } >> +#endif >> return clks; >> } >>
| |