lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND 5/7] RISC-V: entry: Remove unneeded need_resched() loop
From
On Tue, 28 May 2019 03:48:46 PDT (-0700), valentin.schneider@arm.com wrote:
> Since the enabling and disabling of IRQs within preempt_schedule_irq()
> is contained in a need_resched() loop, we don't need the outer arch
> code loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> index 1c1ecc238cfa..d0b1b9660283 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -258,12 +258,11 @@ restore_all:
> resume_kernel:
> REG_L s0, TASK_TI_PREEMPT_COUNT(tp)
> bnez s0, restore_all
> -need_resched:
> REG_L s0, TASK_TI_FLAGS(tp)
> andi s0, s0, _TIF_NEED_RESCHED
> beqz s0, restore_all
> call preempt_schedule_irq
> - j need_resched
> + j restore_all
> #endif
>
> work_pending:

Sorry I missed this the first time around.

Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>

Do you want this through the RISC-V tree, or are you going to take it?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-30 06:10    [W:0.309 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site