lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for May 30 (firmware_loader)
From
On May 31, 2019 2:06:46 AM GMT+02:00, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019 09:10:13 -0700 Randy Dunlap
> <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > on i386 or x86_64:
> > when CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL is not set/enabled:
> >
> > ld: drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_table.o:(.data+0x1c):
> undefined reference to `sysctl_vals'
> > ld: drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_table.o:(.data+0x20):
> undefined reference to `sysctl_vals'
> > ld: drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_table.o:(.data+0x40):
> undefined reference to `sysctl_vals'
> > ld: drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback_table.o:(.data+0x44):
> undefined reference to `sysctl_vals'
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 6a33853c5773 ("proc/sysctl: add shared variables for range check")
>
> Added some more cc's

Hi,

Probably the whole firmware_config_table declaration should be under #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL?

I'll look into it, thanks.
--
Matteo Croce
per aspera ad upstream

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-31 02:53    [W:0.076 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site