Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 03 May 2019 15:56:23 +0800 | From | Rocky Liao <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: Add device property firmware-name for QCA6174 |
| |
Hi Marcel,
On 2019-04-27 13:59, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Rob, > >>>>> This patch adds an optional device property "firmware-name" to >>>>> allow >>>>> the >>>>> driver to load customized nvm firmware file based on this property. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Rocky Liao <rjliao@codeaurora.org> >>>>> --- >>>>> Changes in v3: >>>>> * added firmware-name instead of nvm-postfix to specify full >>>>> firmware >>>>> name >>>>> --- >>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt | 2 ++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git >>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt >>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt >>>>> index 824c0e2..2bcea50 100644 >>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt >>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ Optional properties for compatible string >>>>> qcom,qca6174-bt: >>>>> >>>>> - enable-gpios: gpio specifier used to enable chip >>>>> - clocks: clock provided to the controller (SUSCLK_32KHZ) >>>>> + - firmware-name: specify the name of nvm firmware to load >>>>> >>>>> Required properties for compatible string qcom,wcn3990-bt: >>>>> >>>>> @@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ serial@7570000 { >>>>> >>>>> enable-gpios = <&pm8994_gpios 19 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>>>> clocks = <&divclk4>; >>>>> + firmware-name = "nvm_00440302.bin"; >>>>> }; >>>> >>>> and how is this a firmware-name property. Wouldn’t this be more like >>>> nvm-file or something along these lines. This really needs to be >>>> cleared with Rob to pick the right property name. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Marcel >>> >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> Are you OK to use a property name "nvm-file" or "firmware-nvm-file"? >>> Actually we have two firmware files, one is the patch file which is >>> common to all of the products, the other is the nvm file which is >>> customized. Using a "nvm-file" or "firmware-nvm-file" property name >>> would be more clear. >> >> 'firmware-name' is the standard name for specifying firmware file >> names. > > but it is not a firmware file, it is a NVM file. What happens if in > the future they need a firmware file and a NVM file? > > Regards > > Marcel
We won't need to specify a rampatch firmware file in future as it's a same file for all the boards with same chip, only the NVM firmware file may have board differences. NVM file is also one of the firmware files so I think it should be OK to use "firmware-name" property to specify it.
-- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |