Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 May 2019 08:22:48 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 1/3] softirq: Use preempt_latency_stop/start to trace preemption |
| |
On Wed, 29 May 2019 05:30:56 -0400 Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> Yes, I think so. Also this patch changes CALLER_ADDR0 passed to the > tracepoint because there's one more level of a non-inlined function call > in the call chain right? Very least the changelog should document this > change in functional behavior, IMO.
This sounds more like a break in behavior not a functional change. I guess moving it to a header and making it a static __always_inline should be fine though.
-- Steve
| |