lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: [v5, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size 128/256 in dwmac4
From
Date
Hi Jose,
Flow control is disabled in v5 commit.

I tried "insmod stmmac flow_ctrl=1", and the output log shows self test
pass:
ethtool -t eth0
The test result is PASS
The test extra info:
1. MAC Loopback 0
2. PHY Loopback -95
3. MMC Counters 0
4. EEE -95
5. Hash Filter MC 0
6. Perfect Filter UC 0
7. MC Filter 0
8. UC Filter 0
9. Flow Control 0

Is v5 OK? Should I resend a v6?

On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 10:30 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote:
> From: Biao Huang <biao.huang@mediatek.com>
> Date: Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:31:08
>
> > 1. get hash table size in hw feature reigster, and add support
> > for taller hash table(128/256) in dwmac4.
> > 2. only clear GMAC_PACKET_FILTER bits used in this function,
> > to avoid side effect to functions of other bits.
> >
> > stmmac selftests output log:
> > ethtool -t eth0
> > The test result is FAIL
> > The test extra info:
> > 1. MAC Loopback 0
> > 2. PHY Loopback -95
> > 3. MMC Counters 0
> > 4. EEE -95
> > 5. Hash Filter MC 0
> > 6. Perfect Filter UC 0
> > 7. MC Filter 0
> > 8. UC Filter 0
> > 9. Flow Control 1
>
> Thanks for testing, this patch looks good to me.
>
> Do you want to check why Flow Control selftest is failing ?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu

Thanks,
Biao


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-30 03:39    [W:0.060 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site