lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10 11/12] ima: Define ima-modsig template
Date

Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 00:51 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>> Define new "d-modsig" template field which holds the digest that is
>> expected to match the one contained in the modsig, and also new "modsig"
>> template field which holds the appended file signature.
>>
>> Add a new "ima-modsig" defined template descriptor with the new fields as
>> well as the ones from the "ima-sig" descriptor.
>>
>> Change ima_store_measurement() to accept a struct modsig * argument so that
>> it can be passed along to the templates via struct ima_event_data.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Thanks, Roberto. Just some thoughts inline below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks!

>> +/*
>> + * Validating the appended signature included in the measurement list requires
>> + * the file hash calculated without the appended signature (i.e., the 'd-modsig'
>> + * field). Therefore, notify the user if they have the 'modsig' field but not
>> + * the 'd-modsig' field in the template.
>> + */
>> +static void check_current_template_modsig(void)
>> +{
>> +#define MSG "template with 'modsig' field also needs 'd-modsig' field\n"
>> + struct ima_template_desc *template;
>> + bool has_modsig, has_dmodsig;
>> + static bool checked;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + /* We only need to notify the user once. */
>> + if (checked)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + has_modsig = has_dmodsig = false;
>> + template = ima_template_desc_current();
>> + for (i = 0; i < template->num_fields; i++) {
>> + if (!strcmp(template->fields[i]->field_id, "modsig"))
>> + has_modsig = true;
>> + else if (!strcmp(template->fields[i]->field_id, "d-modsig"))
>> + has_dmodsig = true;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (has_modsig && !has_dmodsig)
>> + pr_notice(MSG);
>> +
>> + checked = true;
>> +#undef MSG
>> +}
>> +
>
> There was some recent discussion about supporting per IMA policy rule
> template formats. This feature will allow just the kexec kernel image
> to require ima-modsig. When per policy rule template formats support
> is upstreamed, this function will need to be updated.

Indeed. Thanks for the clarification. For the next iteration I rebased
on top of Matthew Garret's "IMA: Allow profiles to define the desired
IMA template" patch. I'm currently adapting this check accordingly.

>> @@ -389,3 +425,25 @@ int ima_eventsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data,
>> return ima_write_template_field_data(xattr_value, event_data->xattr_len,
>> DATA_FMT_HEX, field_data);
>> }
>> +
>> +int ima_eventmodsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data,
>> + struct ima_field_data *field_data)
>> +{
>> + const void *data;
>> + u32 data_len;
>> + int rc;
>> +
>> + if (!event_data->modsig)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The xattr_value for IMA_MODSIG is a runtime structure containing
>> + * pointers. Get its raw data instead.
>> + */
>
> "xattr_value"? The comment needs some clarification.

Oops, forgot to update this comment. This is the new version:

/*
* modsig is a runtime structure containing pointers. Get its raw data
* instead.
*/

--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-28 21:10    [W:0.087 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site