[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] printk/sysrq: Don't play with console_loglevel
On (05/28/19 12:21), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> What I suggested in my proposal ("printk: Introduce "store now but print later" prefix." at
> )
> is "whether the caller wants to defer printing to consoles regarding
> this printk() call". And your suggestion is "whether the caller wants
> to apply ignore_loglevel regarding this printk() call".

I'm not sure about "store now but print later" here. What Dmitry is
talking about:

bump console_loglevel on *this* particular CPU only,
not system-wide.
/* Which is implemented in a form of - all messages from this-CPU
* only should be printed regardless the loglevel, the rest should
* pass the usual suppress_message_printing() check. */


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-28 06:23    [W:0.128 / U:14.444 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site