lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] modules: fix livelock in add_unformed_module()
From
Date


On 5/13/19 10:37 AM, Barret Rhoden wrote:
> Hi -
>

Hey Barret, my apologies for not getting back to you earlier. I got caught up
in something that took me away from this issue.

> On 5/13/19 7:23 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> [snip]
>> A module is loaded once for each cpu.
>
> Does one CPU succeed in loading the module, and the others fail with EEXIST?
>
>> My follow-up patch changes from wait_event_interruptible() to
>> wait_event_interruptible_timeout() so the CPUs are no longer sleeping and can
>> make progress on other tasks, which changes the return values from
>> wait_event_interruptible().
>>
>> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=155724085927589&w=2
>>
>> I believe this also takes your concern into account?
>
> That patch might work for me, but I think it papers over the bug where the check
> on old->state that you make before sleeping (was COMING || UNFORMED, now !LIVE)
> doesn't match the check to wake up in finished_loading().
>
> The reason the issue might not show up in practice is that your patch basically
> polls, so the condition checks in finished_loading() are only a quicker exit.
>
> If you squash my patch into yours, I think it will cover that case. Though if
> polling is the right answer here, it also raises the question of whether or not
> we even need finished_loading().
>

The more I look at this I think you're right. Let me do some additional testing
with your patch + my original patch.

P.


> Barret

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-22 19:09    [W:2.791 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site