lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: raw: brcmnand: fallback to detected ecc-strength, ecc-step-size
Hi Kamal,

Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com> wrote on Fri, 17 May 2019 14:29:55
-0400:

> This change supports nand-ecc-step-size and nand-ecc-strenght fields in

strength

> brcmnand dt node to be optional.

DT ^ extra space

> see: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt
>
> If both nand-ecc-strength and nand-ecc-step-size are not specified in
> device tree node for NAND, nand_base driver does detect onfi ext ecc

s/nand_base driver/the raw NAND layer/
s/onfi/ONFI/
s/ecc/ECC/

What is "ext"? Please use plain English here.

> info from ONFI extended parameter page for parts using ONFI >= 2.1. In

s/info/information/

> case of non-onfi NAND there could be a nand_id table entry with the ecc

s/ecc/ECC/

> info. If there is a valid device tree entry for nand-ecc-strength and
> nand-ecc-step-size fields it still shall override the detected values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> index ce0b8ff..e967b30 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> @@ -2144,6 +2144,16 @@ static int brcmnand_setup_dev(struct brcmnand_host *host)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + if (!(chip->ecc.size > 0 && chip->ecc.strength > 0) &&

Is the case where only size OR strength is valid handled?

> + (chip->base.eccreq.strength > 0 &&
> + chip->base.eccreq.step_size > 0)) {
> + /* use detected ecc parameters */

Use ECC

> + chip->ecc.size = chip->base.eccreq.step_size;
> + chip->ecc.strength = chip->base.eccreq.strength;
> + pr_info("Using detected nand-ecc-step-size %d, nand-ecc-strength %d\n",
> + chip->ecc.size, chip->ecc.strength);
> + }
> +
> switch (chip->ecc.size) {
> case 512:
> if (chip->ecc.algo == NAND_ECC_HAMMING)


Thanks,
Miquèl

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-20 15:09    [W:0.087 / U:2.152 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site