[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kexec_buffer measure
[Cc'ing Paul, John, Casey]

On Mon, 2019-04-22 at 20:18 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> [Cc'ing LSM mailing list]
> On Fri, 2019-04-19 at 17:30 -0700, prakhar srivastava wrote:
> > 2) Adding a LSM hook
> > We are doing both the command line and kernel version measurement in IMA.
> > Can you please elaborate on how this can be used outside of the scenario?
> > That will help me come back with a better design and code. I am
> > neutral about this.
> As I said previously, initially you might want to only measure the
> kexec boot command line, but will you ever want to verify or audit log
> the boot command line hash?  Perhaps LSMs would be interested in the
> boot command line.  Should this be an LSM hook?

From an LSM perspective, is there any interest in the boot command line?


 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-02 17:49    [W:0.065 / U:4.644 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site