lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 05/23] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API
From
Date
On 02/05/2019 07:58, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Jean-Philippe,
>
> On 5/1/19 12:38 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> On 08/04/2019 13:18, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> +int iommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
>>> + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (unlikely(!domain->ops->cache_invalidate))
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> +
>>> + ret = domain->ops->cache_invalidate(domain, dev, inv_info);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>
>> Nit: you don't really need ret
>>
>> The UAPI looks good to me, so
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
> Just to make sure, do you accept changes proposed by Jacob in
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/29/659 ie.
> - the addition of NR_IOMMU_INVAL_GRANU in enum iommu_inv_granularity and
> - the addition of NR_IOMMU_CACHE_TYPE

Ah sorry, I forgot about that, I'll review the next version. Yes they
can be useful (maybe call them IOMMU_INV_GRANU_NR and
IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR?). I guess it's legal to export in UAPI values
that will change over time, as VFIO also does it in its enums.

Thanks,
Jean

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-02 12:54    [W:0.093 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site