lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 1/3] firmware: qcom_scm: Use proper types for dma mappings
Date
We need to use the proper types and convert between physical addresses
and dma addresses here to avoid mismatch warnings. This is especially
important on systems with a different size for dma addresses and
physical addresses. Otherwise, we get the following warning:

drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c: In function "qcom_scm_assign_mem":
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:469:47: error: passing argument 3 of "dma_alloc_coherent" from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]

We also fix the size argument to dma_free_coherent() because that size
doesn't need to be aligned after it's already aligned on the allocation
size. In fact, dma debugging expects the same arguments to be passed to
both the allocation and freeing sides of the functions so changing the
size is incorrect regardless.

Reported-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi <akdwived@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
---
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
index af4eee86919d..0c63495cf269 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/dma-direct.h>
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
@@ -449,6 +450,7 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
phys_addr_t mem_to_map_phys;
phys_addr_t dest_phys;
phys_addr_t ptr_phys;
+ dma_addr_t ptr_dma;
size_t mem_to_map_sz;
size_t dest_sz;
size_t src_sz;
@@ -466,9 +468,10 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,
ptr_sz = ALIGN(src_sz, SZ_64) + ALIGN(mem_to_map_sz, SZ_64) +
ALIGN(dest_sz, SZ_64);

- ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, &ptr_phys, GFP_KERNEL);
+ ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, &ptr_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ptr)
return -ENOMEM;
+ ptr_phys = dma_to_phys(__scm->dev, ptr_dma);

/* Fill source vmid detail */
src = ptr;
@@ -498,7 +501,7 @@ int qcom_scm_assign_mem(phys_addr_t mem_addr, size_t mem_sz,

ret = __qcom_scm_assign_mem(__scm->dev, mem_to_map_phys, mem_to_map_sz,
ptr_phys, src_sz, dest_phys, dest_sz);
- dma_free_coherent(__scm->dev, ALIGN(ptr_sz, SZ_64), ptr, ptr_phys);
+ dma_free_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, ptr, ptr_dma);
if (ret) {
dev_err(__scm->dev,
"Assign memory protection call failed %d.\n", ret);
--
Sent by a computer through tubes
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-17 23:10    [W:0.141 / U:4.448 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site