Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 May 2019 12:47:15 -0400 | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] tracing: silence GCC 9 array bounds warning |
| |
On Fri, 17 May 2019 11:25:02 +0200 Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Starting with GCC 9, -Warray-bounds detects cases when memset is called > starting on a member of a struct but the size to be cleared ends up > writing over further members. > > Such a call happens in the trace code to clear, at once, all members > after and including `seq` on struct trace_iterator: > > In function 'memset', > inlined from 'ftrace_dump' at kernel/trace/trace.c:8914:3: > ./include/linux/string.h:344:9: warning: '__builtin_memset' offset > [8505, 8560] from the object at 'iter' is out of the bounds of > referenced subobject 'seq' with type 'struct trace_seq' at offset > 4368 [-Warray-bounds] > 344 | return __builtin_memset(p, c, size); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > In order to avoid GCC complaining about it, we compute the address > ourselves by adding the offsetof distance instead of referring > directly to the member. > > Since there are two places doing this clear (trace.c and trace_kdb.c), > take the chance to move the workaround into a single place in > the internal header.
Hi Miguel,
Linus mentioned this too.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wihYB8w__YQjgYjYZsVniu5CtkTcFycmCGdqVg8GUje7g@mail.gmail.com/T/#u
I was going to do a helper function, and put it in the queue for the next merge window (as it isn't really a bug, just gcc complaining a little more aggressively). But since you already did the patch, I'll use yours. But I have some nits about it below.
Add here:
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wihYB8w__YQjgYjYZsVniu5CtkTcFycmCGdqVg8GUje7g@mail.gmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> > --- > kernel/trace/trace.c | 7 +------ > kernel/trace/trace.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c | 7 +------ > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c > index ca1ee656d6d8..37990532351b 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c > @@ -8627,12 +8627,7 @@ void ftrace_dump(enum ftrace_dump_mode > oops_dump_mode) > cnt++; > > - /* reset all but tr, trace, and overruns */ > - memset(&iter.seq, 0, > - sizeof(struct trace_iterator) - > - offsetof(struct trace_iterator, seq)); > - iter.iter_flags |= TRACE_FILE_LAT_FMT;
Setting the LAT_FMT isn't something a function called "reset" should do.
> - iter.pos = -1; > + trace_iterator_reset(&iter); > > if (trace_find_next_entry_inc(&iter) != NULL) { > int ret; > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h > index d80cee49e0eb..80ad656f43eb 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h > @@ -1964,4 +1964,18 @@ static inline void > tracer_hardirqs_off(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1) { } > extern struct trace_iterator *tracepoint_print_iter; > > +/* reset all but tr, trace, and overruns */ > +static __always_inline void trace_iterator_reset(struct > trace_iterator * iter) +{ > + /* > + * Equivalent to &iter->seq, but avoids GCC 9 complaining > about > + * overwriting more members than just iter->seq > (-Warray-bounds) > + */ > + memset((char *)(iter) + offsetof(struct trace_iterator,
Why (char *)? Please use (void *).
> seq), 0, > + sizeof(struct trace_iterator) - > + offsetof(struct trace_iterator, seq));
Make a variable for offset and reuse that (see Linus's email).
> + iter->iter_flags |= TRACE_FILE_LAT_FMT;
Again, leave the LAT_FMT change in the other locations.
Please send a v2 version with these updates.
Thanks!
-- Steve
> + iter->pos = -1; > +} > + > #endif /* _LINUX_KERNEL_TRACE_H */ > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c > index 810d78a8d14c..0a2a166ee716 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c > @@ -41,12 +41,7 @@ static void ftrace_dump_buf(int skip_lines, long > cpu_file) > kdb_printf("Dumping ftrace buffer:\n"); > > - /* reset all but tr, trace, and overruns */ > - memset(&iter.seq, 0, > - sizeof(struct trace_iterator) - > - offsetof(struct trace_iterator, seq)); > - iter.iter_flags |= TRACE_FILE_LAT_FMT; > - iter.pos = -1; > + trace_iterator_reset(&iter); > > if (cpu_file == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) { > for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
| |