lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH 2/4] perf/ring_buffer: Add ordering to rb->nest increment
Similar to how decrementing rb->next too early can cause data_head to
(temporarily) be observed to go backward, so too can this happen when
we increment too late.

This barrier() ensures the rb->head load happens after the increment,
both the one in the 'goto again' path, as the one from
perf_output_get_handle() -- albeit very unlikely to matter for the
latter.

Fixes: ef60777c9abd ("perf: Optimize the perf_output() path by removing IRQ-disables")
Suggested-by: Yabin Cui <yabinc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
@@ -48,6 +48,15 @@ static void perf_output_put_handle(struc
unsigned long head;

again:
+ /*
+ * In order to avoid publishing a head value that goes backwards,
+ * we must ensure the load of @rb->head happens after we've
+ * incremented @rb->nest.
+ *
+ * Otherwise we can observe a @rb->head value before one published
+ * by an IRQ/NMI happening between the load and the increment.
+ */
+ barrier();
head = local_read(&rb->head);

/*

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-17 13:56    [W:0.074 / U:10.360 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site