lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] simple_lmk: Introduce Simple Low Memory Killer for Android
On Wed, 15 May 2019 10:27:28 -0700
Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 04:58:32PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Could you explain in detail what exactly did you do and what do you see in dmesg?
> >
> > Just in case, lockdep complains only once, print_circular_bug() does debug_locks_off()
> > so it it has already reported another false positive __lock_acquire() will simply
> > return after that.
> >
> > Oleg.
>
> This is what I did:
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index 774ab79d3ec7..009e7d431a88 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -3078,6 +3078,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
> int class_idx;
> u64 chain_key;
>
> + BUG_ON(!debug_locks || !prove_locking);
> if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/lib/debug_locks.c b/lib/debug_locks.c
> index 124fdf238b3d..4003a18420fb 100644
> --- a/lib/debug_locks.c
> +++ b/lib/debug_locks.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debug_locks_silent);
> */
> int debug_locks_off(void)
> {
> + return 0;

I'm confused why you did this?

-- Steve

> if (debug_locks && __debug_locks_off()) {
> if (!debug_locks_silent) {
> console_verbose();
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-15 20:33    [W:0.085 / U:11.260 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site