Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 14 May 2019 04:03:42 +1000 (AEST) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] security subsystem: Tomoyo updates for v5.2 |
| |
On Sun, 12 May 2019, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > My guess is that you are right and > > any *significant* changes to the LSM layer itself, e.g. security/*, is > > best sent via James' tree. For smaller changes to the LSM layer I > > think it's okay if they go in via an individual LSM tree so long as > > all the other LSMs agree-on/ack the changes; which pretty much fits > > what we've been doing for some time now and it seems to work well > > enough. > > Yeah, I think that's the sane model. And I think it's mostly been working.
New LSMs also need to be guided in, as part of a community effort.
-- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
| |