lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [May]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] vsock/virtio: Initialize core virtio vsock before registering the driver
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 05:30:01PM -0700, Jorge E. Moreira wrote:
> Avoid a race in which static variables in net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c are
> accessed (while handling interrupts) before they are initialized.
>
>
> [ 4.201410] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffe8
> [ 4.207829] IP: vsock_addr_equals_addr+0x3/0x20
> [ 4.211379] PGD 28210067 P4D 28210067 PUD 28212067 PMD 0
> [ 4.211379] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> [ 4.211379] Modules linked in:
> [ 4.211379] CPU: 1 PID: 30 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 4.14.106-419297-gd7e28cc1f241 #1
> [ 4.211379] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
> [ 4.211379] Workqueue: virtio_vsock virtio_transport_rx_work
> [ 4.211379] task: ffffa3273d175280 task.stack: ffffaea1800e8000
> [ 4.211379] RIP: 0010:vsock_addr_equals_addr+0x3/0x20
> [ 4.211379] RSP: 0000:ffffaea1800ebd28 EFLAGS: 00010286
> [ 4.211379] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffffb94e42f0
> [ 4.211379] RDX: 0000000000000400 RSI: ffffffffffffffe0 RDI: ffffaea1800ebdd0
> [ 4.211379] RBP: ffffaea1800ebd58 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
> [ 4.211379] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffffb89d5d60 R12: ffffaea1800ebdd0
> [ 4.211379] R13: 00000000828cbfbf R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffaea1800ebdc0
> [ 4.211379] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa3273fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 4.211379] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 4.211379] CR2: ffffffffffffffe8 CR3: 000000002820e001 CR4: 00000000001606e0
> [ 4.211379] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [ 4.211379] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [ 4.211379] Call Trace:
> [ 4.211379] ? vsock_find_connected_socket+0x6c/0xe0
> [ 4.211379] virtio_transport_recv_pkt+0x15f/0x740
> [ 4.211379] ? detach_buf+0x1b5/0x210
> [ 4.211379] virtio_transport_rx_work+0xb7/0x140
> [ 4.211379] process_one_work+0x1ef/0x480
> [ 4.211379] worker_thread+0x312/0x460
> [ 4.211379] kthread+0x132/0x140
> [ 4.211379] ? process_one_work+0x480/0x480
> [ 4.211379] ? kthread_destroy_worker+0xd0/0xd0
> [ 4.211379] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> [ 4.211379] Code: c7 47 08 00 00 00 00 66 c7 07 28 00 c7 47 08 ff ff ff ff c7 47 04 ff ff ff ff c3 0f 1f 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 8b 47 08 <3b> 46 08 75 0a 8b 47 04 3b 46 04 0f 94 c0 c3 31 c0 c3 90 66 2e
> [ 4.211379] RIP: vsock_addr_equals_addr+0x3/0x20 RSP: ffffaea1800ebd28
> [ 4.211379] CR2: ffffffffffffffe8
> [ 4.211379] ---[ end trace f31cc4a2e6df3689 ]---
> [ 4.211379] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
> [ 4.211379] Kernel Offset: 0x37000000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
> [ 4.211379] Rebooting in 5 seconds..
>
> Fixes: 22b5c0b63f32 ("vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic after device hot-unplug")
> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: kernel-team@android.com
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [4.9+]
> Signed-off-by: Jorge E. Moreira <jemoreira@google.com>
> ---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> index 15eb5d3d4750..96ab344f17bb 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c
> @@ -702,28 +702,27 @@ static int __init virtio_vsock_init(void)
> if (!virtio_vsock_workqueue)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - ret = register_virtio_driver(&virtio_vsock_driver);
> + ret = vsock_core_init(&virtio_transport.transport);

Have you checked that all transport callbacks are safe even if another
CPU calls them while virtio_vsock_probe() is executing on another CPU?

> if (ret)
> goto out_wq;
>
> - ret = vsock_core_init(&virtio_transport.transport);
> + ret = register_virtio_driver(&virtio_vsock_driver);
> if (ret)
> - goto out_vdr;
> + goto out_vci;
>
> return 0;
>
> -out_vdr:
> - unregister_virtio_driver(&virtio_vsock_driver);
> +out_vci:
> + vsock_core_exit();
> out_wq:
> destroy_workqueue(virtio_vsock_workqueue);
> return ret;
> -
> }
>
> static void __exit virtio_vsock_exit(void)
> {
> - vsock_core_exit();
> unregister_virtio_driver(&virtio_vsock_driver);
> + vsock_core_exit();
> destroy_workqueue(virtio_vsock_workqueue);
> }

The virtio_vsock_exit() order is intentional:

commit 22b5c0b63f32568e130fa2df4ba23efce3eb495b
Author: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Feb 1 12:42:06 2019 +0100

vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic after device hot-unplug

virtio_vsock_remove() invokes the vsock_core_exit() also if there
are opened sockets for the AF_VSOCK protocol family. In this way
the vsock "transport" pointer is set to NULL, triggering the
kernel panic at the first socket activity.

This patch move the vsock_core_init()/vsock_core_exit() in the
virtio_vsock respectively in module_init and module_exit functions,
that cannot be invoked until there are open sockets.

Calling vsock_core_exit() after unregister_virtio_driver() is likely to
lead to the issue that Stefano tried to fix.

Is it necessary to change virtio_vsock_exit()?

Stefan
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-05-01 21:09    [W:0.129 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site