Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ACPI / LPSS: Don't skip late system PM ops for hibernate on BYT/CHT | From | Hans de Goede <> | Date | Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:16:22 +0200 |
| |
Hi,
On 07-04-19 22:58, Robert R. Howell wrote: > On 4/3/19 2:54 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> On 03-04-19 07:43, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >>> i2c-designware-platdrv fails to work after the system restored from >>> hibernation: >>> [ 272.775692] i2c_designware 80860F41:00: Unknown Synopsys component type: 0xffffffff >>> >>> Commit 48402cee6889 ("ACPI / LPSS: Resume BYT/CHT I2C controllers from >>> resume_noirq") makes acpi_lpss_{suspend_late,resume_early}() bail early >>> on BYT/CHT as resume_from_noirq is set. This means dw_i2c_plat_resume() >>> doesn't gets called by acpi_lpss_resume_early(), and this causes the >>> issue. >>> > ... >> >> The ordering problem fixed by commit 48402cee6889 can hit hibernate too, >> so I think it would be better to do this instead to fix this problem: >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c >> index 1e2a10a06b9d..cf768608437e 100644 > ... >> If people affected by the problem can give my version of the fix a test, >> then that would be great. >> >> Regards, >> >> Hans > > I did try applying your (Hans') patch to a 5.0.0 and a 5.1-rc3 kernel, instead of what I had > been doing previously, which was reverting commit 02e45646d53b. I tested it on an ASUS T100TA > and unfortunately with both kernels after resume from hibernation I still get errors like those > listed below, and sound no longer works. I also tried applying the patch from Kai-Heng Feng > (instead of Hans' patch or my revert) on both kernels and again in both cases I get these same errors. > > In contrast, on the 5.0.0 kernel when I revert 02e45646d53b, the problem is fixed. Because > of changes in adjacent code in 5.1-rc3, I haven't yet found a way to merge the new code > and the 02e45646d53b revert without causing worse problems. But that's probably because > I don't really understand the details of that code. > > [ 120.690428] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: timeout waiting for bus ready > [ 120.690442] rt5640 i2c-10EC5640:00: Failed to write 13d = 3600: -110 > [ 120.712860] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: timeout waiting for bus ready > [ 120.737389] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: timeout waiting for bus ready > [ 120.759657] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: timeout waiting for bus ready > [ 120.781797] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: timeout waiting for bus ready > [ 120.804153] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: timeout waiting for bus ready > [ 120.826467] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: timeout waiting for bus ready > [ 121.965886] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: timeout in disabling adapter > ..... > [ 132.782634] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: controller timed out > [ 133.806538] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: controller timed out > [ 134.830991] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: controller timed out > [ 135.855183] i2c_designware 80860F41:01: controller timed out > > Let me know if I can do any other testing to help.
Hmm, interesting so you have hibernation working on a T100TA (with 5.0 + 02e45646d53b reverted), right ?
I must admit I never try hibernation myself, in experience it tends to have more issues then regular suspend/resume and there are already enough other issues to worry about on Bay and Cherry Trail based devices.
But if it works on the T100TA and 02e45646d53b broke it then I will try to fix this, I've a T100TA myself. Currently my T100TA is at my local hackerspace, so I will not have access to it until coming Friday.
Regards,
Hans
| |