lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RT WARNING] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current) with fsfreeze (4.19.25-rt16)
On 2019-04-30 15:28:11 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 02:51:31PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2019-04-19 10:56:27 [+0200], Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > On 26/03/19 10:34, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Running this reproducer on a 4.19.25-rt16 kernel (with lock debugging
> > > > turned on) produces warning below.
> > >
> > > And I now think this might lead to an actual crash.
> >
> > Peter, could you please take a look at the thread:
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190419085627.GI4742@localhost.localdomain
> >
> > I assumed that returning to userland with acquired locks is something we
> > did not want…
>
> Yeah, but AFAIK fs freezing code has a history of doing exactly that..
> This is just the latest incarnation here.
>
> So the immediate problem here is that the task doing thaw isn't the same
> that did freeze, right? The thing is, I'm not seeing how that isn't a
> problem with upstream either.
>
> The freeze code seems to do: percpu_down_write() for the various states,
> and then frobs lockdep state.
>
> Thaw then does the reverse, frobs lockdep and then does: percpu_up_write().
>
> percpu_down_write() directly relies on down_write(), and
> percpu_up_write() on up_write(). And note how __up_write() has:
>
> DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON(sem->owner != current, sem);
>
> So why isn't this same code coming unstuck in mainline?

I have to re-route most of this questions to Juri Lelli.
Lockdep has these gems:
lockdep_sb_freeze_release() / lockdep_sb_freeze_acquire()

Sebastian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-30 15:45    [W:0.132 / U:2.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site