lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: ti-lmu: Remove LM3532 backlight driver references
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:

> On 3/25/19 8:53 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Mar 2019, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Lee,
> > >
> > > Can we have your ack for this going via LED tree, please?
> >
> > Patch looks okay.
> >
> > You can take it through the LED, but if you do I will need you to send
> > me a pull-request to a minimised immutable branch please.
> >
> > If you cannot do this, I can apply the set and provide the same to
> > you.
> >
> > If you choose the former:
> >
> > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >
> > Please let me know what you decide
> >
>
> I've been exposing integration branches in the past, but after Linus'
> message [0] I have my doubts now. I wonder if it wouldn't make more
> sense if I just took the patches, and you'd cherry-pick them only in
> case such a need occurs. This way we would avoid this whole merge
> noise, which in an optimistic and very plausible case will not be needed
> at all.
>
> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/19/1104

That email is 2 years old, and does not seem relevant to what we're
trying to achieve. I've only ever had issues when *not* creating
immutable branches for these, cross subsystem scenarios. The
shared branches I create are always minimalist and never change.

I'm happy to take the patches and create a suitable pull-request for
you if you are uncomfortable with the process. I just need your Ack
to do so. Up to you.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-03 09:58    [W:0.085 / U:2.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site