Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] irqchip/bcm: Restore registration print with %pOF | From | Marc Zyngier <> | Date | Mon, 29 Apr 2019 09:29:00 +0100 |
| |
On 26/04/2019 18:33, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 3/20/19 12:39 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> It is useful to print which interrupt controllers are registered in the >> system and which parent IRQ they use, especially given that L2 interrupt >> controllers do not call request_irq() on their parent interrupt and do >> not appear under /proc/interrupts for that reason. >> >> We used to print the base register address virtual address which had >> little value, use %pOF to print the path to the Device Tree node which >> maps to the physical address more easily and is what people need to >> troubleshoot systems. >> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> > > Marc, are you okay with taking that patch?
I find it slightly pointless, but if you find it useful in the field, fair enough. I've queued it for 5.2.
Thanks,
M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
| |