lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] PM / Domains: Improve support for CPUs in genpd
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 12:14, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:11 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 11:56, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:04 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Recently genpd was extended to cope with devices belonging to CPUs. However,
> > > > attaching CPU devices via genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id|name() doesn't work,
> > > > because of the virtual device that genpd allocates in this path.
> > > >
> > > > In this series, this limitation is addressed, together with a few other related
> > > > fixes/cleanups.
> > > >
> > > > Ulf Hansson (4):
> > > > PM / Domains: Use the base device for
> > > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state()
> > > > PM / Domains: Drop unused in-parameter to some genpd functions
> > > > PM / Domains: Search for the CPU device outside the genpd lock
> > > > PM / Domains: Allow to attach a CPU via
> > > > genpd_dev_pm_attach_by_id|name()
> > > >
> > > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 1 +
> > > > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Are there any dependencies between this and the series you've recently posted?
> >
> > Yep. I should have stated that, sorry. This should be applied on top.
>
> On top of which series?

[PATCH 0/3] PM / Domains: Improve support for multi PM domains

and

[PATCH v13 0/4] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM)

Kind regards
Uffe

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-25 12:18    [W:0.056 / U:3.228 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site