[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Add polling support to pidfd
On 20.04.19 01:29, Daniel Colascione wrote:

> The point I'm making, to be> very clear, is *NOT* that process monitoring is "not worth>
considering", but that process monitoring is subtle and complicated>
enough that it ought to be considered as a standalone project,>
independent of pidfds proper and of the very simple and effective> pidfd
system that Joel has proposed in his patch series.

At that point I'm wondering: what pidfd is actually meant for,
if not process monitoring ?


Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering -- +49-151-27565287

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-24 11:19    [W:0.071 / U:0.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site