Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Add polling support to pidfd | From | "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <> | Date | Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:17:15 +0200 |
| |
On 20.04.19 01:29, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> The point I'm making, to be> very clear, is *NOT* that process monitoring is "not worth> considering", but that process monitoring is subtle and complicated> enough that it ought to be considered as a standalone project,> independent of pidfds proper and of the very simple and effective> pidfd system that Joel has proposed in his patch series.
At that point I'm wondering: what pidfd is actually meant for, if not process monitoring ?
--mtx
-- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult Free software and Linux embedded engineering info@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287
| |