lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 3/3] backlight: lm3630a: add firmware node support
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 08:49:20AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > +static int lm3630a_parse_led_sources(struct fwnode_handle *node,
> > + int default_led_sources)
> > +{
> > + u32 sources[LM3630A_NUM_SINKS];
> > + int ret, num_sources, i;
> > +
> > + num_sources = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "led-sources", NULL,
> > + 0);
> > + if (num_sources < 0)
> > + return default_led_sources;
> > + else if (num_sources > ARRAY_SIZE(sources))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32_array(node, "led-sources", sources,
> > + num_sources);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_sources; i++) {
> > + if (sources[i] < LM3630A_SINK_0 || sources[i] > LM3630A_SINK_1)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ret |= BIT(sources[i]);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int lm3630a_parse_bank(struct lm3630a_platform_data *pdata,
> > + struct fwnode_handle *node, int *seen_led_sources)
>
> Why is seen_led_sources passed in here?
> It is initialized on the stack in lm3630a_parse_node but the variable is never referenced in that API.

It's to see all of the led-sources that are configured across all of the
banks. If it is just in lm3630a_parse_bank(), then it won't catch the
following invalid configuration:

led@0 {
reg = <0>;
led-sources = <0 1>;
label = "lcd-backlight";
default-brightness = <200>;
};

led@1 {
reg = <1>;
default-brightness = <150>;
};

Brian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-23 16:02    [W:0.043 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site