[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Disable SDIO interrupts while suspended to fix suspend/resume

On 2019/4/22 23:21, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 3:13 PM Douglas Anderson <> wrote:
>> Processing SDIO interrupts while dw_mmc is suspended (or partly
>> suspended) seems like a bad idea. We really don't want to be
>> processing them until we've gotten ourselves fully powered up.
>> You might be wondering how it's even possible to become suspended when
>> an SDIO interrupt is active. As can be seen in
>> dw_mci_enable_sdio_irq(), we explicitly keep dw_mmc out of runtime
>> suspend when the SDIO interrupt is enabled. ...but even though we
>> stop normal runtime suspend transitions when SDIO interrupts are
>> enabled, the dw_mci_runtime_suspend() can still get called for a full
>> system suspend.
>> Let's handle all this by explicitly masking SDIO interrupts in the
>> suspend call and unmasking them later in the resume call. To do this
>> cleanly I'll keep track of whether the client requested that SDIO
>> interrupts be enabled so that we can reliably restore them regardless
>> of whether we're masking them for one reason or another.
>> Without this fix it can be seen that rk3288-veyron Chromebooks with
>> Marvell WiFi would sometimes fail to resume WiFi even after picking my
>> recent mwifiex patch [1]. Specifically you'd see messages like this:
>> mwifiex_sdio mmc1:0001:1: Firmware wakeup failed
>> mwifiex_sdio mmc1:0001:1: PREP_CMD: FW in reset state
>> ...and tracing through the resume code in the failing cases showed
>> that we were processing a SDIO interrupt really early in the resume
>> call.
>> NOTE: downstream in Chrome OS 3.14 and 3.18 kernels (both of which
>> support the Marvell SDIO WiFi card) we had a patch ("CHROMIUM: sdio:
>> Defer SDIO interrupt handling until after resume") [2]. Presumably
>> this is the same problem that was solved by that patch.
>> [1]
>> [2]
>> Cc: <>
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <>
>> ---
>> I didn't put any "Fixes" tag here, but presumably this could be
>> backported to whichever kernels folks found it useful for. I have at
>> least confirmed that kernels v4.14 and v4.19 (as well as v5.1-rc2)
>> show the problem. It is very easy to pick this to v4.19 and it
>> definitely fixes the problem there.
>> I haven't spent the time to pick this to 4.14 myself, but presumably
>> it wouldn't be too hard to backport this as far as v4.13 since that
>> contains commit 32dba73772f8 ("mmc: dw_mmc: Convert to use
>> MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD for SDIO IRQs"). Prior to that it might
>> make sense for anyone experiencing this problem to just pick the old
>> CHROMIUM patch to fix them.
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 3 +++
>> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> Jaehoon / Shawn: any thoughts on this patch?

The intention seems reasonable to me, but just wonder if we need
mask/unmask SDIO interrupt when it's never used? It's the same
situation for SDMMC_CLKEN_LOW_PWR that we couldn't stop providing
clock for SDIO cards, so I guess we need to check MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ
as well.

> -Doug

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-24 02:57    [W:0.095 / U:1.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site