lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Add polling support to pidfd
On 04/19, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> > Just for the exit notification purposes, the states are:
> > if process has exit_state == 0, block.
> > if process is zombie/dead but not reaped, then return POLLIN
> > if process is reaped, then return POLLIN | POLLHUP
>
> Oleg was explicitly against EXIT_ZOMBIE/DEAD thing, no? He said so in a
> prior mail. Has this been addressed?

Yes, please don't use EXIT_XXX codes, nobody should ever use them except the
core kernel exit/wait paths. For example, EXIT_DEAD means that the task auto-
reaps or its parent had to temporary drop tasklist.

Just check ->exit_state != 0 && thread_group_empty(). Note that we need
thread_group_empty() only for the case when the task is traced, in this case
we have an extra notification for debugger which can confuse pidfd_poll().

And of course, everything will differ if/when we will need to monitor the
sub-threads.

And btw I don't think it needs tasklist_lock, but lets discuss this when we
have a new version based on pidfd.

Oleg.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-20 13:52    [W:0.138 / U:0.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site