[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v20 00/28] Intel SGX1 support
On 2019-04-19 14:31, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I do think we need to follow LSM rules. But my bigger point is that there are policies that don’t allow JIT at all. I think we should arrange the SGX API so it’s still usable when such a policy is in effect.

I don't think we need to arrange that right now. This patch set needs to
be merged after more than 2 years of development. I'd like to avoid
introducing any more big changes. Let's just do what I described to make
LSM not broken, which is a minimal change to the current approach. We
can adjust the API later to support the use case you describe.

Jethro Beekman | Fortanix

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-19 23:36    [W:0.207 / U:2.884 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site