[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] mm/workingset : judge file page activity via timestamp
On Wed 17-04-19 19:36:21, Zhaoyang Huang wrote:
> sorry for the confusion. What I mean is the basic idea doesn't change
> as replacing the refault criteria from refault_distance to timestamp.
> But the detailed implementation changed a lot, including fix bugs,
> update the way of packing the timestamp, 32bit/64bit differentiation
> etc. So it makes sense for starting a new context.

Not really. My take away from the previous discussion is that Johannes
has questioned the timestamping approach itself. I wasn't following very
closely so I might be wrong here but if that is really the case then it
doesn't make much sense to improve the implementation if there is no
consensus on the approach itself.

Michal Hocko

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-17 13:47    [W:0.055 / U:1.984 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site