lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] include: dt-bindings: add Performance Monitoring Unit for Exynos
From
Date
Hi Chanwoo,

On 4/17/19 10:10 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On 19. 4. 17. 오후 4:48, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> This patch add support of a new feature which can be used in DT:
>> Performance Monitoring Unit with defined event data type.
>> In this patch the event data types are defined for Exynos PPMU.
>> The patch also updates the MAINTAINERS file accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 5 +++++
>> include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 3671fde..f4aac78 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -12376,6 +12376,11 @@ L: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
>> S: Supported
>> F: drivers/scsi/pm8001/
>>
>> +PMU EXYNOS DT BINDINGS
>> +M: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>
>> +S: Maintained
>> +F: include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h
>> +
>
> IMHO, I'm not sure that it is right of adding one dt-binding header file
> to MAINTAINERS file. If right, I'm OK.
>
>
>> PNP SUPPORT
>> M: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> S: Maintained
>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h b/include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..a6971eb
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pmu/exynos_ppmu.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +/*
>> + * Samsung Exynos PPMU event types for counting in regs
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2019, Samsung
>> + * Author: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_PMU_EXYNOS_PPMU_H
>> +#define __DT_BINDINGS_PMU_EXYNOS_PPMU_H
>> +
>> +
>> +#define PPMU_RO_BUSY_CYCLE_CNT 0x0
>> +#define PPMU_WO_BUSY_CYCLE_CNT 0x1
>> +#define PPMU_RW_BUSY_CYCLE_CNT 0x2
>> +#define PPMU_RO_REQUEST_CNT 0x3
>> +#define PPMU_WO_REQUEST_CNT 0x4
>> +#define PPMU_RO_DATA_CNT 0x5
>> +#define PPMU_WO_DATA_CNT 0x6
>> +#define PPMU_RO_LATENCY 0x12
>> +#define PPMU_WO_LATENCY 0x16
>> +#define PPMU_V2_EVT3_RW_DATA_CNT 0x22
>
> If we can select the data type for monitoring, it looks good to me.
> But, when I developed the Exynos PPMU, I has not tested other data type
> except for PPMU_RO_DATA_CNT and PPMU_WO_DATA_CNT.
>
> Do you test all data types with PPMU device?
Yes, I have tested all - 1 of them on Odroid XU4 with memory controller
and they work. I haven't checked the last option for Exynos5433,
but it should work since it was default option in your driver.

Regards,
Lukasz
>
>> +
>> +#endif
>>
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-17 12:52    [W:0.054 / U:0.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site