lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] arm: mm: Export __sync_icache_dcache() for xen-privcmd
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 11:03:51AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:41:37AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 10:51:09PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 06:30:52PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > This patch avoids
> > > > ERROR: "__sync_icache_dcache" [drivers/xen/xen-privcmd.ko] undefined!
> > > > observed when compiling v4.19.34.
> > > >
> > > > The xen-privcmd driver, which can be modular, calls set_pte_at()
> > > > which in turn may call __sync_icache_dcache().
> > >
> > > Maybe that really is a sign that it should not be modular..
> >
> > This issue has been discussed several times, and this URL gives a list
> > of all messages on linux-arm-kernel that mention __sync_icache_dcache:
> >
> > https://archive.armlinux.org.uk/lurker/search/20380101.000000.00000000@ml:linux-arm-kernel,sb:__sync_icache_dcache.en.html
> >
> > At the beginning of March, Boris Ostrovsky pointed that another solution
> > is available that does not need architecture private symbols to be
> > exported.
> >
> > Since I've already said in a previous thread that I don't want this
> > function exported, it seems the way forward is pretty obvious.
>
> Arnd submitted a patch, not sure what happened to it:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190304204826.2414365-1-arnd@arndb.de/

Thanks Catalin, this is the "another solution" that I referred to above.
(You'll find the exact same URL in Boris' email.)

> I think this boils down to whether set_pte_at() is allowed to be called
> from loadable modules. If yes, __sync_icache_dcache() needs exporting,
> otherwise Arnd's patch makes the relevant code built-in (and, if merged,
> I'm happy to revert the similar export on arm64).

I think I've clearly expressed my opinion on that. Hence why "the way
forward is pretty obvious." I don't understand why we still have the
problem.

--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-17 12:31    [W:0.047 / U:0.344 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site