lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v11 3/7] anybus-s: support the Arcx anybus controller
From
Date
On 16.04.19 23:23, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:

Hi,

> Well yes, we could treat it as an mfd device, with a common register accessor,> which registers anybus-s host and adc drivers, all selectable via>
Kconfig / defconfig... But that's a lot of extra code just to handle one
single> bit in a register, which is a boolean input.> > Can be done but
is it worth it?
hmm, I think the main question here is clean separation between
subsystems - devices that span multiple subsystems, IMHO, fall
into the category "mfd".

separate drivers probably don't make much sense here, but maybe
a CONFIG_ flag for disabling this functionality ?

>> Does this power read-out involve some CAN traffic, or is it just
>> fetching from some card that just happens to be some CAN interface ?
>> (IOW: is cansocket needed for that ?)
>
> It is purely a boolean input. The boolean output of a voltage monitor chip.
> When our hardware is assembled, the voltage monitor input is connected
> to a signal which indicates the CAN status. In theory, it could be connected
> to the factory's light switch. It would then read out the status of the factory
> floor lights. It has no CAN functionality whatsoever.

hmm, wouldn't the input subsystem be more appropriate for that ?


--mtx

--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-17 10:41    [W:0.078 / U:0.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site