lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH linux-next v10 5/7] powerpc: define syscall_get_error()
syscall_get_error() is required to be implemented on this
architecture in addition to already implemented syscall_get_nr(),
syscall_get_arguments(), syscall_get_return_value(), and
syscall_get_arch() functions in order to extend the generic
ptrace API with PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request.

Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@altlinux.org>
Cc: Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
---

Michael, this patch is waiting for ACK since early December.

Notes:
v10: unchanged
v9: unchanged
v8: unchanged
v7: unchanged
v6: unchanged
v5: initial revision

This change has been tested with
tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/get_syscall_info.c and strace,
so it's correct from PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO point of view.

This cast doubts on commit v4.3-rc1~86^2~81 that changed
syscall_set_return_value() in a way that doesn't quite match
syscall_get_error(), but syscall_set_return_value() is out
of scope of this series, so I'll just let you know my concerns.

See also https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/874lbbt3k6.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au/
for more details on powerpc syscall_set_return_value() confusion.

arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h
index a048fed0722f..bd9663137d57 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/syscall.h
@@ -38,6 +38,16 @@ static inline void syscall_rollback(struct task_struct *task,
regs->gpr[3] = regs->orig_gpr3;
}

+static inline long syscall_get_error(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ /*
+ * If the system call failed,
+ * regs->gpr[3] contains a positive ERRORCODE.
+ */
+ return (regs->ccr & 0x10000000UL) ? -regs->gpr[3] : 0;
+}
+
static inline long syscall_get_return_value(struct task_struct *task,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
--
ldv
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-16 01:45    [W:0.036 / U:3.148 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site