lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
Subject[PATCH] ext4: fix use-after-free race with debug_want_extra_isize
From
When remounting with debug_want_extra_isize, we were not performing the
same checks that we do during a normal mount. That allowed us to set a
value for s_want_extra_isize that reached outside the s_inode_size.

Reported-by: syzbot+f584efa0ac7213c226b7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---

- In the current code, it looks like someone could mount with want_extra_isize
with some value > 0 but less than the minimums in the s_es. If that's a bug,
I can submit a follow-on patch.

- Similarly, on a failed remount, sbi->s_want_extra_isize is changed to the
remounted value. I can fix that too if it's a problem.

- Is it OK to remount with a smaller s_want_extra_isize than the previous mount?
I thought it was, but figured I'd ask while I'm looking at it.


fs/ext4/super.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 6ed4eb81e674..184944d4d8d1 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -3513,6 +3513,37 @@ int ext4_calculate_overhead(struct super_block *sb)
return 0;
}

+static void ext4_clamp_want_extra_isize(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+ struct ext4_super_block *es = sbi->s_es;
+
+ /* determine the minimum size of new large inodes, if present */
+ if (sbi->s_inode_size > EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE &&
+ sbi->s_want_extra_isize == 0) {
+ sbi->s_want_extra_isize = sizeof(struct ext4_inode) -
+ EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE;
+ if (ext4_has_feature_extra_isize(sb)) {
+ if (sbi->s_want_extra_isize <
+ le16_to_cpu(es->s_want_extra_isize))
+ sbi->s_want_extra_isize =
+ le16_to_cpu(es->s_want_extra_isize);
+ if (sbi->s_want_extra_isize <
+ le16_to_cpu(es->s_min_extra_isize))
+ sbi->s_want_extra_isize =
+ le16_to_cpu(es->s_min_extra_isize);
+ }
+ }
+ /* Check if enough inode space is available */
+ if (EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + sbi->s_want_extra_isize >
+ sbi->s_inode_size) {
+ sbi->s_want_extra_isize = sizeof(struct ext4_inode) -
+ EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE;
+ ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
+ "required extra inode space not available");
+ }
+}
+
static void ext4_set_resv_clusters(struct super_block *sb)
{
ext4_fsblk_t resv_clusters;
@@ -4387,30 +4418,7 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
} else if (ret)
goto failed_mount4a;

- /* determine the minimum size of new large inodes, if present */
- if (sbi->s_inode_size > EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE &&
- sbi->s_want_extra_isize == 0) {
- sbi->s_want_extra_isize = sizeof(struct ext4_inode) -
- EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE;
- if (ext4_has_feature_extra_isize(sb)) {
- if (sbi->s_want_extra_isize <
- le16_to_cpu(es->s_want_extra_isize))
- sbi->s_want_extra_isize =
- le16_to_cpu(es->s_want_extra_isize);
- if (sbi->s_want_extra_isize <
- le16_to_cpu(es->s_min_extra_isize))
- sbi->s_want_extra_isize =
- le16_to_cpu(es->s_min_extra_isize);
- }
- }
- /* Check if enough inode space is available */
- if (EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + sbi->s_want_extra_isize >
- sbi->s_inode_size) {
- sbi->s_want_extra_isize = sizeof(struct ext4_inode) -
- EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE;
- ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, "required extra inode space not"
- "available");
- }
+ ext4_clamp_want_extra_isize(sb);

ext4_set_resv_clusters(sb);

@@ -5194,6 +5202,8 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
goto restore_opts;
}

+ ext4_clamp_want_extra_isize(sb);
+
if ((old_opts.s_mount_opt & EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM) ^
test_opt(sb, JOURNAL_CHECKSUM)) {
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "changing journal_checksum "
--
2.21.0.392.gf8f6787159e-goog
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-15 23:21    [W:0.060 / U:12.056 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site