Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/14] v2 multi-die/package topology support | From | Brice Goglin <> | Date | Fri, 12 Apr 2019 22:40:49 +0200 |
| |
Le 12/04/2019 à 21:52, Len Brown a écrit : >>>> I think I prefer 's/threads/cpus/g' on that. Threads makes me think SMT, >>>> and I don't think there's any guarantee the part in question will have >>>> SMT on. >>> I think 'threads' is a bit confusing as well. We seem to be using 'cpu' >>> everywhere for something we can schedule tasks on, including the sysfs >>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/ subdirs for each SMT thread on SMT systems. > I agree with Peter and Morten. > "cpu" is more clear and consistent than "thread" here. > I'll spin the series with that string changed.
Agreed, I should have used that suffix from the beginning.
Brice
| |