lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] misc: rtsx: Fixed rts5260 power saving parameter and sd glitch
From
Date
at 16:56, ricky_wu@realtek.com wrote:

> From: RickyWu <ricky_wu@realtek.com>
>
> this patch fixes rts5260 power saving parameter
> make power saving function work on L1.1, L1.2
>
> Signed-off-by: RickyWu <ricky_wu@realtek.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/cardreader/rts5260.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cardreader/rts5260.c
> b/drivers/misc/cardreader/rts5260.c
> index da22bcb62b04..b510d3f46587 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cardreader/rts5260.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cardreader/rts5260.c
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static int sd_set_sample_push_timing_sd30(struct
> rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> | SD_ASYNC_FIFO_NOT_RST, SD_30_MODE | SD_ASYNC_FIFO_NOT_RST);
> rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, CLK_CTL, CLK_LOW_FREQ, CLK_LOW_FREQ);
> rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, CARD_CLK_SOURCE, 0xFF,
> - CRC_VAR_CLK0 | SD30_FIX_CLK | SAMPLE_VAR_CLK1);
> + CRC_VAR_CLK0 | SD30_FIX_CLK | SAMPLE_VAR_CLK1);

Just a nit, seems to be an unnecessary change.

> rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, CLK_CTL, CLK_LOW_FREQ, 0);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -238,8 +238,8 @@ static int rts5260_card_power_on(struct rtsx_pcr
> *pcr, int card)
> /* Reset SD_CFG3 register */
> rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, SD_CFG3, SD30_CLK_END_EN, 0);
> rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, REG_SD_STOP_SDCLK_CFG,
> - SD30_CLK_STOP_CFG_EN | SD30_CLK_STOP_CFG1 |
> - SD30_CLK_STOP_CFG0, 0);
> + SD30_CLK_STOP_CFG_EN | SD30_CLK_STOP_CFG1 |
> + SD30_CLK_STOP_CFG0, 0);

Ditto.

>
> rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, REG_PRE_RW_MODE, EN_INFINITE_MODE, 0);
>
> @@ -315,12 +315,12 @@ static void rts5260_init_ocp(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
>
>
> rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, RTS5260_DVCC_CTRL,
> - RTS5260_DVCC_OCP_THD_MASK,
> - option->sd_800mA_ocp_thd);
> + RTS5260_DVCC_OCP_THD_MASK,
> + option->sd_800mA_ocp_thd);

Ditto.

>
> rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, RTS5260_DV331812_CFG,
> - RTS5260_DV331812_OCP_THD_MASK,
> - RTS5260_DV331812_OCP_THD_270);
> + RTS5260_DV331812_OCP_THD_MASK,
> + RTS5260_DV331812_OCP_THD_270);

Ditto.

That said, the patch works,
Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>

>
> mask = SD_OCP_GLITCH_MASK;
> val = pcr->hw_param.ocp_glitch;
> @@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ static void rts5260_pwr_saving_setting(struct
> rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> lss_l1_2 = rtsx_check_dev_flag(pcr, ASPM_L1_2_EN)
> | rtsx_check_dev_flag(pcr, PM_L1_2_EN);
>
> + rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, ASPM_FORCE_CTL, 0xFF, 0);
> if (lss_l1_2) {
> pcr_dbg(pcr, "Set parameters for L1.2.");
> rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, PWR_GLOBAL_CTRL,
> @@ -573,10 +574,10 @@ static int rts5260_extra_init_hw(struct rtsx_pcr
> *pcr)
> * to drive low, and we forcibly request clock.
> */
> if (option->force_clkreq_0)
> - rtsx_pci_add_cmd(pcr, WRITE_REG_CMD, PETXCFG,
> + rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, PETXCFG,
> FORCE_CLKREQ_DELINK_MASK, FORCE_CLKREQ_LOW);
> else
> - rtsx_pci_add_cmd(pcr, WRITE_REG_CMD, PETXCFG,
> + rtsx_pci_write_register(pcr, PETXCFG,
> FORCE_CLKREQ_DELINK_MASK, FORCE_CLKREQ_HIGH);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -704,7 +705,7 @@ void rts5260_init_params(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr)
> option->ocp_en = 1;
> if (option->ocp_en)
> hw_param->interrupt_en |= SD_OC_INT_EN;
> - hw_param->ocp_glitch = SDVIO_OCP_GLITCH_800U | SDVIO_OCP_GLITCH_800U;
> + hw_param->ocp_glitch = SD_OCP_GLITCH_100U | SDVIO_OCP_GLITCH_800U;
> option->sd_400mA_ocp_thd = RTS5260_DVCC_OCP_THD_550;
> option->sd_800mA_ocp_thd = RTS5260_DVCC_OCP_THD_970;
> }
> --
> 2.17.1


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-10 09:48    [W:0.042 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site