Messages in this thread | | | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> | Date | Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:42:14 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range |
| |
Hi Steve,
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:39 PM Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com> wrote: > On 01 April 2019 10:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:43 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:15:56AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > > > The DA9062 and DA9063 have a year register that can go up to 0x3F. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> > > > > > > I couldn't test the upper limit (DA9063 hooked to a 32bit system here), > > > but lower limit works and RTC in general works. > > > > BTW, does the RTC alarm interrupt work for you? > > As far as I can tell, there are no RTC alarm regressions. > > I am using an i.MX6Q board and with an unmodified v5.1-rc1 kernel, for the > alarms, I see everything working okay WITHOUT Alexandre's patches ...
Thanks!
I was just wondering whether they work for Wolfram, who has a similar but different board than I have. Last time I tried, they didn't work for me.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |