lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range
Hi Steve,

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:39 PM Steve Twiss
<stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com> wrote:
> On 01 April 2019 10:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:43 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:15:56AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > The DA9062 and DA9063 have a year register that can go up to 0x3F.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > >
> > > I couldn't test the upper limit (DA9063 hooked to a 32bit system here),
> > > but lower limit works and RTC in general works.
> >
> > BTW, does the RTC alarm interrupt work for you?
>
> As far as I can tell, there are no RTC alarm regressions.
>
> I am using an i.MX6Q board and with an unmodified v5.1-rc1 kernel, for the
> alarms, I see everything working okay WITHOUT Alexandre's patches ...

Thanks!

I was just wondering whether they work for Wolfram, who has a similar
but different board than I have. Last time I tried, they didn't work for me.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-01 14:43    [W:0.114 / U:1.772 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site