lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: add writable context for raw tracepoints
From
Date
On 03/29/2019 01:07 AM, Matt Mullins wrote:
> This is an opt-in interface that allows a tracepoint to provide a safe
> buffer that can be written from a BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT program.
> The size of the buffer must be a compile-time constant, and is checked
> before allowing a BPF program to attach to a tracepoint that uses this
> feature.
>
> The pointer to this buffer will be the first argument of tracepoints
> that opt in; the buffer is readable by both BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT
> and BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE programs that attach to such a
> tracepoint, but the buffer to which it points may only be written by the
> latter.
>
> bpf_probe: assert that writable tracepoint size is correct

Maybe also add a kselftest into bpf test suite to i) demo it and ii) make
sure it's continuously been tested by bots running the suite?

> Signed-off-by: Matt Mullins <mmullins@fb.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/bpf_types.h | 1 +
> include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h | 1 +
> include/trace/bpf_probe.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 8 ++++++--
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 +++++++++++
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 8 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index a2132e09dc1c..d3c71fd67476 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ enum bpf_reg_type {
> PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL, /* reg points to sock_common or NULL */
> PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK, /* reg points to struct tcp_sock */
> PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL, /* reg points to struct tcp_sock or NULL */
> + PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER, /* reg points to a writable raw tp's buffer */
> };
>
> /* The information passed from prog-specific *_is_valid_access
> @@ -352,6 +353,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
> u32 used_map_cnt;
> u32 max_ctx_offset;
> u32 max_pkt_offset;
> + u32 max_tp_access;
> u32 stack_depth;
> u32 id;
> u32 func_cnt; /* used by non-func prog as the number of func progs */
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_types.h b/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> index 08bf2f1fe553..c766108608cb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_types.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE, kprobe)
> BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, tracepoint)
> BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT, perf_event)
> BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, raw_tracepoint)
> +BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE, raw_tracepoint_writable)
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF
> BPF_PROG_TYPE(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE, cg_dev)
> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h b/include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h
> index 49ba9cde7e4b..b29950a19205 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint-defs.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct bpf_raw_event_map {
> struct tracepoint *tp;
> void *bpf_func;
> u32 num_args;
> + u32 writable_size;
> } __aligned(32);
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/include/trace/bpf_probe.h b/include/trace/bpf_probe.h
> index 505dae0bed80..d6e556c0a085 100644
> --- a/include/trace/bpf_probe.h
> +++ b/include/trace/bpf_probe.h
> @@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ __bpf_trace_##call(void *__data, proto) \
> * to make sure that if the tracepoint handling changes, the
> * bpf probe will fail to compile unless it too is updated.
> */
> -#undef DEFINE_EVENT
> -#define DEFINE_EVENT(template, call, proto, args) \
> +#define __DEFINE_EVENT(template, call, proto, args, size) \
> static inline void bpf_test_probe_##call(void) \
> { \
> check_trace_callback_type_##call(__bpf_trace_##template); \
> @@ -81,12 +80,36 @@ __bpf_trace_tp_map_##call = { \
> .tp = &__tracepoint_##call, \
> .bpf_func = (void *)__bpf_trace_##template, \
> .num_args = COUNT_ARGS(args), \
> + .writable_size = size, \
> };
>
> +#define FIRST(x, ...) x
> +
> +#undef DEFINE_EVENT_WRITABLE
> +#define DEFINE_EVENT_WRITABLE(template, call, proto, args, size) \
> +static inline void bpf_test_buffer_##call(void) \
> +{ \
> + /* BUILD_BUG_ON() is ignored if the code is completely eliminated, but \
> + * BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() uses a different mechanism that is not \
> + * dead-code-eliminated. \
> + */ \
> + FIRST(proto); \
> + (void)BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(size != sizeof(*FIRST(args))); \
> +} \
> +__DEFINE_EVENT(template, call, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), size)
> +
> +#undef DEFINE_EVENT
> +#define DEFINE_EVENT(template, call, proto, args) \
> + __DEFINE_EVENT(template, call, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), 0)
>
> #undef DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT
> #define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT(template, name, proto, args, print) \
> DEFINE_EVENT(template, name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args))
>
> #include TRACE_INCLUDE(TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE)
> +
> +#undef DEFINE_EVENT_WRITABLE
> +#undef __DEFINE_EVENT
> +#undef FIRST
> +
> #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 3c38ac9a92a7..c5335d53ce82 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_LIRC_MODE2,
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_REUSEPORT,
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR,
> + BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE,
> };
>
> enum bpf_attach_type {
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 62f6bced3a3c..27e2f22879a4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -1720,12 +1720,16 @@ static int bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(const union bpf_attr *attr)
> }
> raw_tp->btp = btp;
>
> - prog = bpf_prog_get_type(attr->raw_tracepoint.prog_fd,
> - BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT);
> + prog = bpf_prog_get(attr->raw_tracepoint.prog_fd);
> if (IS_ERR(prog)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(prog);
> goto out_free_tp;
> }
> + if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT &&
> + prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE) {

I don't think we'd gain a lot by making this an extra prog type which can do the
same as BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT modulo optional writing. Why not integrating
this directly into BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT then? The actual opt-in comes from
the DEFINE_EVENT_WRITABLE(), not from the prog type.

> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_put_prog;
> + }
>
> err = bpf_probe_register(raw_tp->btp, prog);
> if (err)
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index ce166a002d16..b6b4a2ca9f0c 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -2100,6 +2100,17 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
> err = check_sock_access(env, insn_idx, regno, off, size, t);
> if (!err && value_regno >= 0)
> mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
> + } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER) {
> + if (off < 0) {
> + verbose(env,
> + "R%d invalid tracepoint buffer access: off=%d, size=%d",
> + value_regno, off, size);
> + return -EACCES;
> + }
> + if (off + size > env->prog->aux->max_tp_access)
> + env->prog->aux->max_tp_access = off + size;
> + if (t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
> + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);

This should also disallow variable access into the reg, I presume (see check_ctx_reg())?
Or is there a clear rationale for having it enabled?

> } else {
> verbose(env, "R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n", regno,
> reg_type_str[reg->type]);
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index d64c00afceb5..a2dd79dc6871 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -909,6 +909,24 @@ const struct bpf_verifier_ops raw_tracepoint_verifier_ops = {
> const struct bpf_prog_ops raw_tracepoint_prog_ops = {
> };
>
> +static bool raw_tp_writable_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
> + enum bpf_access_type type,
> + const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> + struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
> +{
> + if (off == 0 && size == sizeof(u64))
> + info->reg_type = PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER;
> + return raw_tp_prog_is_valid_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
> +}
> +
> +const struct bpf_verifier_ops raw_tracepoint_writable_verifier_ops = {
> + .get_func_proto = raw_tp_prog_func_proto,
> + .is_valid_access = raw_tp_writable_prog_is_valid_access,
> +};
> +
> +const struct bpf_prog_ops raw_tracepoint_writable_prog_ops = {
> +};
> +
> static bool pe_prog_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
> const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info)
> @@ -1198,6 +1216,9 @@ static int __bpf_probe_register(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp, struct bpf_prog *
> if (prog->aux->max_ctx_offset > btp->num_args * sizeof(u64))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (prog->aux->max_tp_access > btp->writable_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> return tracepoint_probe_register(tp, (void *)btp->bpf_func, prog);
> }
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-04-01 22:41    [W:0.062 / U:24.512 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site