Messages in this thread | | | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Date | Wed, 6 Mar 2019 20:24:49 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PULL REQUEST] Kernel lockdown patches for 5.2 |
| |
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 7:56 PM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > The kexec and kernel modules patches in this patch set continues to > ignore IMA. This patch set should up front either provide an > alternative solution to coordinate the different signature > verification methods or rely on the architecture specific policy for > that coordination.
Hi Mimi,
I'm working on a patch for this at the moment which can then be added to either patchset. Is there a tree that contains the proposed Power architecture policy? I want to make sure I don't accidentally end up depending on anything x86.
| |