lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] KVM: arm64: Force a PTE mapping when logging is enabled
From
Date
Hi Zenghui, Suzuki,

On 04/03/2019 17:13, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Zenghui,
>
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 11:14:38PM +0800, Zenghui Yu wrote:
>> I think there're still some problems in this patch... Details below.
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 11:39 AM Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The idea behind this is: we don't want to keep tracking of huge pages when
>>> logging_active is true, which will result in performance degradation. We
>>> still need to set vma_pagesize to PAGE_SIZE, so that we can make use of it
>>> to force a PTE mapping.
>
> Yes, you're right. We are indeed ignoring the force_pte flag.
>
>>>
>>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Atfer looking into https://patchwork.codeaurora.org/patch/647985/ , the
>>> "vma_pagesize = PAGE_SIZE" logic was not intended to be deleted. As far
>>> as I can tell, we used to have "hugetlb" to force the PTE mapping, but
>>> we have "vma_pagesize" currently instead. We should set it properly for
>>> performance reasons (e.g, in VM migration). Did I miss something important?
>>>
>>> ---
>>> virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 7 +++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>>> index 30251e2..7d41b16 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>>> @@ -1705,6 +1705,13 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>>> (vma_pagesize == PUD_SIZE && kvm_stage2_has_pmd(kvm))) &&
>>> !force_pte) {
>>> gfn = (fault_ipa & huge_page_mask(hstate_vma(vma))) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> + } else {
>>> + /*
>>> + * Fallback to PTE if it's not one of the stage2
>>> + * supported hugepage sizes or the corresponding level
>>> + * doesn't exist, or logging is enabled.
>>
>> First, Instead of "logging is enabled", it should be "force_pte is true",
>> since "force_pte" will be true when:
>>
>> 1) fault_supports_stage2_pmd_mappings() return false; or
>> 2) "logging is enabled" (e.g, in VM migration).
>>
>> Second, fallback some unsupported hugepage sizes (e.g, 64K hugepage with
>> 4K pages) to PTE is somewhat strange. And it will then _unexpectedly_
>> reach transparent_hugepage_adjust(), though no real adjustment will happen
>> since commit fd2ef358282c ("KVM: arm/arm64: Ensure only THP is candidate
>> for adjustment"). Keeping "vma_pagesize" there as it is will be better,
>> right?
>>
>> So I'd just simplify the logic like:
>
> We could fix this right in the beginning. See patch below:
>
>>
>> } else if (force_pte) {
>> vma_pagesize = PAGE_SIZE;
>> }
>>
>>
>> Will send a V2 later and waiting for your comments :)
>
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> index 30251e2..529331e 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> @@ -1693,7 +1693,9 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> - vma_pagesize = vma_kernel_pagesize(vma);
> + /* If we are forced to map at page granularity, force the pagesize here */
> + vma_pagesize = force_pte ? PAGE_SIZE : vma_kernel_pagesize(vma);
> +
> /*
> * The stage2 has a minimum of 2 level table (For arm64 see
> * kvm_arm_setup_stage2()). Hence, we are guaranteed that we can
> @@ -1701,11 +1703,10 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> * As for PUD huge maps, we must make sure that we have at least
> * 3 levels, i.e, PMD is not folded.
> */
> - if ((vma_pagesize == PMD_SIZE ||
> - (vma_pagesize == PUD_SIZE && kvm_stage2_has_pmd(kvm))) &&
> - !force_pte) {
> + if (vma_pagesize == PMD_SIZE ||
> + (vma_pagesize == PUD_SIZE && kvm_stage2_has_pmd(kvm)))
> gfn = (fault_ipa & huge_page_mask(hstate_vma(vma))) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - }
> +
> up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
>
> /* We need minimum second+third level pages */
That's pretty interesting, because this is almost what we already have
in the NV code:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/tree/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c?h=kvm-arm64/nv-wip-v5.0-rc7#n1752

(note that force_pte is gone in that branch).

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-03-04 18:34    [W:0.082 / U:1.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site